The Pathfinder Blog
The premier forum
for sharing best practices
in organizational, personal and
professional development
PRESS RELEASE - How Students Are Succeeding With Our College Preparedness Program
Corporate Kool-Aid - PR and Marketing specifically geared towards imprinting the corporate culture and brand as a positive mindset and way of life. In the most successful cases, this is done in such a way that the individual who has "drunk the corporate kool-aid" will, outside of work and uncompensated, serve as a willing and engaged corporate spokesperson, advocating and promoting the corporation's stated views and agenda as a True Believer.
When the people who work for an organization, within a work group, or on a project team commit themselves in enthusiastic harmony to achieve measurably excellent results, we often say of them "Wow! They really drank the Kool-Aid!"
It isn't the actual soft drink we're talking about, of course. Since it's first (terrible) use as such in 1978, "drinking the Kool-Aid," in the corporate sense, has evolved into a broad metaphor for that magical moment when people become energized by and engaged in their work, aligned with the goals they share, and hungry to claim the bragging rights that come with a scorecard full of real, tangible accomplishments.
Engagement, alignment, execution - using two simple recipes, you can custom-mix your own unique batch of "Corporate Kool-Aid" from these four basic flavors:
People who feel they just can't know enough about something, who gather and relish the tiniest details to master a particular body of knowledge, who pride themselves in crossing the t's and dotting the i's and getting everything exactly right... they tend to favor the Cool Blue "Smart Expert" brand flavor of Corporate Kool-Aid.
People who like to get to the point, who enjoy formulating a clear vision of what "done" will look like and then get to work scheduling, tracking, and driving it into existence... these folks prefer the sharp Red "Take Charge" Kool-Aid brand flavor.
People who enjoy rallying the troops, imaginative people who take pride in preparing and presenting innovative ideas in exciting, motivating ways... these people prefer the energizing Yellow "Exciting Party" brand flavor.
People who seek consensus, foster harmonious professional relationships and communities, value fairness, respect tradition, honor and follow the rules... these people prefer the smooth Green "Trusty Partner" brand flavor.
So, what's your personal Kool-Aid brand flavor?
From the point of view of your workplace role or job, read the following descriptions and rank each from 1 to 4, where you feel you most identify with your #1 choice and least identify with your #4 choice.
Fill in your personal Kool-Aid brand flavor recipe card with two scoops of your #1 choice plus one scoop of your #2 choice:
Organizations are people, too. Successfully aligned groups, from the smallest teams to entire companies, define themselves by exhibiting a collective style of behavior that clearly expresses their shared values, beliefs, and sense of mission.
Take a moment to study this table of 16 example organizations.
Starting with the four representative organizations in the upper left (Blue) quadrant of the table, MIT (1), Google (2), the Global Governance Institute (5), and Bloomberg TV (6), all share a general mission of research and knowledge, but each approaches it in a unique way:
Take a look at the example organizations (3, 4, 7, and 8) in the upper right (Red) quadrant:
Consider the example organizations (11, 12, 15, and 16) in the lower right (Yellow) quadrant.
Finally, think about the example organizations (9, 10, 13, and 14) in the lower left (Green) quadrant.
So, what's your company's brand Kool-Aid flavor? From these 16 examples, select one and only one company that you believe most closely represents the "brand" of your company.
Having trouble? Can't decide between two, or maybe even from among three or more?
That's a problem. The leaders of successful companies all agree on the particular Kool-Aid brand flavor of the organizations they run, and they do such a great job communicating this aligned brand promise that, in exercises like this one, 85%+ of the people who work within, buy from, or are served by those organizations pick the same or an immediately adjacent (very similar) company.
So, leaders: take your time, think deeply and carefully about this, talk it over and come to a consensus. Once you, your partners, your Board, and your executive team completely agree on your organization's one specific brand of Corporate Kool Aid, mix and drink a big batch by selecting your recipe from this table:
Congratulations. That's the recipe for your organization's one and only Kool Aid Brand flavor. Make a habit of drinking it, your brand will come through in your words and deeds, and, before long, your customers and the people who work for you will develop a taste for it, too.
Assume a virtue if you have it not. - Shakespeare, Hamlet, Act III Scene 4
From now on, you'll be using your two recipes, your personal and company Kool-Aid flavors, to brew two big pitchers. Here's how I make mine:
I'm the kind of guy who seeks attention, loves to jump to the front of a room and draw engaging pictures that attract attention and communicate interesting ideas, but with the ultimate goal of getting everyone on the same page and working together toward some goal.
That's mostly Yellow with some Red, so I use two scoops of Yellow and one scoop of Red to mix my personal brand pitcher of Kool-Aid.
Working with my partners, I help deliver a service that applies the findings of behavioral research (Blue) to align and engage teams of people in a specialized process of informed self-discovery (...with some Yellow). So, closest to our example of Bloomberg TV, it takes two scoops of Blue and one scoop of Yellow to mix my company's Brand of Kool-Aid.
That's my Kool-Aid Diet. I build positive energy by drinking a full glass of my Personal Kool-Aid Brand early in the morning: that is, I start my day recognizing and celebrating my motivational Yellow and get-er-done Red strengths.
When I get to work, I drink a full glass of my Company Kool-Aid Brand: that is, I tone down my instincts to overtly influence (Yellow) and directly supervise (Red) my clients as I dial up my respect for the knowledge base foundation of my work (a healthy dose of Blue...) and reinforce my faith that, properly organized and carefully presented, this information will lead my clients to a positive and transformative conclusion (...plus a little Yellow).
My partners and colleagues are drinking the same stuff and willingly making similar adaptations. So, as I work with them during the business day, I'm effectively helping myself to a couple more reinforcing big doses of the Company Kool-Aid, and this Kool-Aid effect is doubled when, as a result, we rack up a shared success.
We just love it when our customers - and especially our competitors - say: "Wow! They really drank the Kool-Aid."
_____________________________
Al presents the Corporate Kool-Aid Cookbook (in one-hour interactive lecture and three-hour workshop formats) for various organizations, including Vistage International. If you're interested in scheduling a presentation for your company or organization, contact him at al.cini@teamperformanceworkout.com.
Elaborating on these simple "Kool-Aid" principals in his role as Facilitator at Onward Education and Training, Al combines accepted behavioral science with uniquely effective coaching and improvement techniques to deliver the Team Performance Workout program, which engages and aligns groups or teams and shifts their focus from merely "doing things" to actually getting things done.
"I think if I could have seen the shore, I would have made it."
In the Summer of 1952, Florence May Chadwick set off to swim the 26 miles of ocean that stretches from the coast of California to Catalina Island. After about 15 hours, a thick fog rolled in. She swam for another hour before, unable to see the shore, she gave up and asked to be pulled into one of the support boats that flanked her.
She later learned that she quit just one mile from her goal.
Florence tried again two months later, and, again, a thick fog set in.
But this time she kept going and made it, she later said, by keeping a mental image of the shore in her mind.
"The only thing worse than being blind is having sight but no vision." - Helen Keller
- Helen Keller
Thanks to friend and partner Ric McNally for pointing me to this lesson.
I remember playing outside my home one bright summer morning, a happy little kid running around happily with all of my happy little friends, when my parents approached me with a proposition.
“We're going to the Beach today!” they pronounced through broad smiles.
I was only five years old, had no idea what “the Beach” was, and, besides, I was having a grand time with my friends in our yard, so I politely passed on the opportunity and kept playing.
That's when my parents pulled out their PowerPoint slides.
The Beach Water! As far as the eye can see You can walk or swim in it You'll be completely safe We'll hold your hand We won't let go Sand! As much as you want You can dig holes in it as deep as you like We'll even let you bury us in it Candy and Ice Cream! Amusement Rides!
The Beach
OK, ok, I was sold. I sent my friends home, climbed into the car with my parents, and off we went.
And went, and went, and went. When you're only five years old, a couple of hours trapped in a car is a very significant percentage of your life to date.
So, peering ahead through the windshield, straining to see as far up the road as I could, I tried to spot this Beach I'd been sold. I'd see a house in the dim distance, or a tall tree, and I'd figure Wow! That must be the Beach! A few minutes later, though, we'd motor right past it, so I'd ask:
“Are we there yet?”
At first, my parents would smile and explain that the Beach was farther away, but that we'd be there soon.
So, I looked ahead again as far as I could see, and spotted a telephone pole, or an office building, and figured, “well, then that thing surely must be the Beach.” But we'd drive past it a few minutes later, and I'd ask again if we were there yet, and my parents would repeat, through thinner smiles this time, that the beach was farther away and we'd be there soon.
Our collective patience waned pretty quickly as I asked over and over, until finally, typical salespeople, they ordered me to stop asking and suggested I take a nap.
I woke up as we finally made it to the Beach, which was very hot, and very crowded, with impossibly long lines of sunburned tourists trailing up far ahead of us to every amusement ride. Yes, there was plenty of water, but it was dirty and cold and rough and full of strange people. Yes, there was plenty of sand everywhere, including in my ice cream, on my candy, and especially in my bathing suit and sneakers.
Covered in greasy sunscreen and toasted in the spots we missed, we packed up after a few hours and headed silently back home in our car. As the Beach faded in our rear-view mirror, I put the whole miserable experience out of my mind. Until I grew up.
My professional life sometimes feels like my childhood trip to the Beach. People are selling me the Future all the time, a Future filled with wonderful products and services, a marvelous place where everything works and everyone's happy. We're off to “The Beach!”
It's a bumpy ride, though, so be sure to buckle up.
Questions
"Everything happens for a reason. It is what it is. Whatever will be, will be. Accidents happen."
Sound familiar? They're all common, everyday variations of Murphy's Law: "Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong." If you're like most people, you probably drop plenty of phrases like these in casual conversation without thinking much about them.
But let's think about them.
Murphy's Law actually says a lot more about your subjective mental state than your objective situation. It's a way to cope with a very human feeling that, like most people, you hate admitting in yourself as much as you perhaps enjoy celebrating in others: blame. Blame hurts, and that can trigger your instinct to deny facts and rewrite your history
The term "cognitive bias" refers to a family of such coping mechanisms, which are illogical tendencies to custom-tailor reality to better suit your ego. This particular flavor of cognitive bias, claiming personal credit for your successes while attributing your failures to factors beyond your control, is called the self-serving bias. By filtering out inconvenient truths, your self-serving bias helps you to artificially elevate your self-esteem, which, by avoiding the pain of blame for a failure and/or triggering the ego boost that goes with claiming credit for a success, reinforces your biased behavior.
Part of your self-preservation mechanism, your brain is wired to try to control your future, or at least to anticipate and prepare you for it. Therein lies the psychological difference between a promise and a prediction. Your promises commit you to outcomes while your predictions merely involve you in events. A particularly stressful complex of feelings and behaviors, blame happens when things don't turn out as you said they would.
Looking back on a disappointment, did you promise that outcome? Or did you just predict it? Cop to the former and, ouch! You take the blame. On the other hand, if you can somehow pretend to the latter, you can deflect the blame onto your imaginary friend "Murphy."
You learned this as a school child when you promised your English teacher you'd hand her an essay on Friday morning but, OMG! Unpredictably, your dog ate the only copy Thursday night. Can she please give you the weekend to write it again? What did your English teacher teach you when she said Yes?
You grew up and got better at it. One day, as a sales manager, you painted two pretty pictures of the future for your boss: 1) sales for the fourth quarter will be up 15% over last year; and 2) you'll organize the year-end company picnic, which will be held on June 30.
The sun shone bright on the picnic that June 30, but Q4 sales were down 6% from last year. Those blown figures? Well, considering the thin support you got from Marketing, the crappy product design, and a lousy economy, you and your team actually rescued the company by limiting the decline to just 6%. And, hey! Didn't you pick the perfect day for the company picnic?
According to Daniel Pink, author of Drive, you can't buy employee engagement. In fact, when it comes to encouraging people to work hard on brainpower tasks that require broad creativity or focused problem-solving, cash incentives can be more of a de-motivator than a motivator.
Don't believe me? Take ten minutes to watch this enlightening video.
“Bottom line: If we treat people like people, instead of like horses…”
Instead of inspiring excellence, extrinsic monetary rewards can actually discourage excellent work. Research shows that, if you don't pay people enough, they'll feel "ripped off" and stop contributing. On the other hand, if you pay them too much, they can feel they're just the "Flavor of the Day" in an unfair system that's probably ripping other people off and, you guessed it, they'll stop contributing.
First of all, to take money matters off the table and empower your people to focus on their work, your compensation plan needs to be perceived as 1) sufficiently generous and 2) fairly administered. So much for dangling the Almighty Dollar, huh?
Which, according to Pink, leaves you with three behavioral tools that can really pay off in improved performance:
Questions:
People generally think that [harmonious] teams... are better and more productive. But in a study we conducted..., we actually found [that] the cause-and-effect is the reverse of what most people believe: When we're productive and we've done something good together (and are recognized for it), we feel satisfied, not the other way around.
As they work together on a team, people reflexively form subjective, inaccurate impressions about each other. They may perceive threat in a peer's raised voice. They may feel unfairly treated by a leader who seems to smile and joke comfortably with some of their teammates but rarely with them. Result: team members whose interactions with their peers will be aimed at minimizing their personal perception of threat and stress rather than cooperating on accomplishing shared objectives.
Solution: Level the playing field. Give everyone a simple, common behavioral frame of reference for understanding themselves and each other.
In our Team Performance Workout, we use a simple, cost-efficient assessment based on the well-known DISC behavioral model, coupled with a one-hour, personalized coaching session, to level the playing field for a team.
Regardless of their seniority, technical expertise, or position in the organization, nobody ever wins or loses on this behavioral field of play. Based on their personal behavioral style, everyone has unique talents they can choose to contribute, as well as challenges they can work to overcome. In this exercise, where everyone's equal, each individual team member feels safe enough to invest the kind of mutual empathy and respect that can really pay off later in improved team performance.
You can approximate this insightful experience with your team by using the DISC system's four behavioral styles (click to enlarge the image):
Liz is a Natural D (not like a "Mr. Scott") who adapts toward I (like a "Dr. McCoy") at work by becoming less assertive and more expressive and outgoing.
“God doesn't play dice with the Universe.” Thus tweeted the Great Albert Einstein in 1926. And ever since folks have been retweeting his profound revelation about God, straight from the Gospel According to Albert.
Problem is, Einstein didn't exactly say that. Here's what the man actually wrote, in a letter to pioneering quantum physicist Max Born:
“Quantum mechanics is certainly imposing. But an inner voice tells me that it is not yet the real thing. The theory says a lot, but does not really bring us any closer to the secret of the 'old one'. I, at any rate, am convinced that He does not throw dice.”
Turns out Einstein, who by 1926 had earned copious major honors for revealing the architecture of the Cosmic Universe at Large, wasn't really referring to God in his letter at all. The Great Genius was, in fact, confessing his own difficulty in grasping the basic architecture of the Quantum Universe of the Very Small. Biased, perhaps, by his subjective familiarity with a personal Almighty, Albert's “inner voice” had misinformed his perception of the nature of reality's littlest things.
Back in 1926, Einstein strongly believed that randomness in scientific observations resulted from human imperfection in observing and understanding. Make perfect the instruments and sharpen the theory, he figured, and, poof! like a god, you know everything, and can therefore predict the cosmically enormous set of all possible future events, even the very tiniest ones, with 100% certainty.
This Determinist Einstein just couldn't accept what his contemporary particle physicists were demonstrating over and over again in their labs. Where certain behaviors of really little things like electrons and photons are concerned, no matter how smart the physicist or perfect her instruments, making certain kinds of predictions about the outcomes of certain quantum phenomena are, well, just plain uncertain.
So, in his oft-paraphrased and widely misunderstood 1926 letter, the Great Albert Einstein was, duh! just plain wrong – at least about quantum physics, and perhaps even about God, Who may indeed have some sort of Supreme Gambling Problem.
Wait! Don't stop reading. If you're a modern business leader, this story has everything to do with you.
Today's business leaders, of projects and of people, emerge from a fundamentally deterministic management culture wherein every action is believed to have a 100% predictable outcome. This certain world, of course, has its unexpected bugs and breakdowns, but the reliable solution is always process: time-proven repertoires of clearly documented procedures that mitigate the risks of a fault by rigorously squeezing out its pesky uncertainty. “After all,” our inner voice reasons, “aren't people really just like machines?”
The conclusion sounds right, but it's dead-wrong. Unlike machines, people, cursed as they are with Free Will, behave like quantum particles in fundamentally unpredictable ways. Psychologists have long recognized a “Human Uncertainty Principle” of sorts: the more confined people feel by the processes their leaders impose on them, the less predictable their organizational behavior becomes. Business leaders see process as governance, but those so governed often perceive it as tyranny. Especially in the most talented and creative, tyranny triggers rebellion rather than compliance.
Frustrated by process, followers find creative ways to avoid following their leaders. In turn, their leaders, dismissing these little mutinies as failures of their Human machines, sharpen their procedures to tighten the harness and regain control, which only provokes further mutiny. As leaders lend greater and greater weight to following process in order to reduce the degrees of freedom for failure in the groups they manage, they unwittingly generate a psychological “black hole” that ensnares all chances of success as well. Individual efforts stall, projects slip, and neglected infrastructure eventually sputters and fails.
Of course, process certainly plays a role in effective management, but it can't guarantee effective leadership. Go here and begin learning about the non-deterministic, Zen-like principles of Servant-Leadership: that the true path to leading people starts with serving them; that the most effective way to shepherd their efforts is to set them free.
When you come back from reading, try this new kind of “Non-Process” on for size in 2014:
Step 1. Accept intellectually that people behave in non-deterministic ways which necessarily limit your ability to govern their actions.
Step 2. Once you've accepted the basic uncertainty of human behavior, you will naturally begin to question your feelings about your colleagues and subordinates. This fresh uncertainty, while uncomfortable at first, is very healthy. Let it teach you:
Step 3. Beyond articulating the details of tasks, your transcendent role as a leader is to reveal the human value of the larger goals you choose to serve.
Step 4. Once the human value of your organization's goals have been revealed to them, people will drop the heavy baggage of their personal egos and begin to gravitate toward helping you to achieve them. Remember that they aren't following you as a leader; they're following your lead toward something more important than each and all of you. Congratulations! By tapping the source of authentic leadership, you've entered the larger world of the Servant-Leader.
Step 5. Never, ever play favorites. Everyone has value, whether you like them personally or not. Treat everyone with respect and, as you support them, they'll all work hard with you, each in their own wonderfully different way, to help you achieve your organization's goals. (Remember that, on the other hand, you cheapen the work you're trying to inspire when you treat it like a win-lose game. You may think you're being clever, but you undermine your own leadership in the long run when you “play” people for short-term gain.)
Step 6. Full- or part-time employee, contractor, consultant, whatever --everybody's somebody. Be prepared to recognize everyone for the value of their contributions, regardless of what's printed on their business cards.
Step 7. Every organization needs its “operators,” the go-to-guys, the t-crossing and i-dotting detail-oriented folks who devise and follow effective processes. But beware the hidden trap of settling for the merely routine and declaring it “excellence.” Excellence is something more.
Which prompts the most important of questions for any organization or society: what is Excellence?
Is dancing purely a matter of process? Does clear and precise choreography determine the quality of a dance performance? Does putting your feet exactly where and when you're told make you a dancer? Will carefully following a really precise floor chart make you an excellent dancer?
Dancing, especially good dancing, transcends choreography. Excellent dancers exceed the specifications of choreography. They amaze an audience, and pleasantly surprise their choreographer, as they freely capture and ride the spirit of a performance.
Likewise, in all the work we humans do, how can excellence possibly emerge from simply following a process? Can a really good paint-by-numbers Mona Lisa elevate anyone to the level of a DaVinci?
Following process and meeting expectations is adequacy, and adequacy is virtuous. Adequacy has its place.
But excellence is more. Excellence is the miracle of exceeding expectations. Perhaps because we fear failing to repeat it, we sometimes tend to mistrust excellence. So, we shy away from it, perhaps most often by withholding, from ourselves and others, the freedom on which excellence feeds, which it needs to survive.
Here's where old Albert, after nearly a lifetime of saying his share of dumb things, got one absolutely right (Out Of My Later Years, 1950):
“Everything that is really great and inspiring is created by the individual who can labor in freedom.”
Growing up, as I recall, the otherwise festive Christmas holiday season held forth the dreadful prospect of wrestling with a box full of Christmas tree lights.
Ignoring the fact that it's cheaper and easier to replace them each year, perhaps as a matter of honor and tradition, it had become my family's policy that no new tree lights would be purchased until every attempt had been made to untangle and revive the old ones.
In keeping this tradition, I found myself in the same familiar mess every year as I set out to decorate our house with lights. No matter how carefully I may have coiled and packed them away at the end of the previous year, the many separate strands of lights seemed somehow to have found each other during the off-season and hopelessly entangled themselves. This made me angry, as though they'd deliberately, even spitefully, knotted themselves into a perplexing mass of bulbs, plugs, sockets, and wires.
So, as punishment every year, I dealt with them the same traditional way. I shook them vigorously, hoping somehow that the individual strings of lights would repent and separate themselves from each other. When they didn't, I dived aggressively into the middle of the knot, pulled at it from within, stretched it, embraced its confusion and became a part of it. Eventually, one by one, each string of Christmas lights would somehow drop away from the others, until, at last, mission accomplished! But the achievement was always more by accident than design, and never without my fair share of pain.
Still, primates being what they are, even the tiniest and rarest success will strongly reinforce habitual behavior, the bad habits as well as the good. As I looked with pride at the untangled lights, each individual strand now laying on the floor vanquished and submissive (a few literally broken as well), next year's application of the mindless “shake and hope” method, notwithstanding its obvious stupidity, had been assured.
Breaking with tradition is never comfortable, but, one year, for a change, I deliberately calmed myself down and thought about the problem first. I reasoned that, in years past, I had concentrated too hard on the problem's most obvious in-your-face aspect, that infuriating knot of bulbs and wire. In anger, I had traditionally attacked it, literally, from the inside. This may have felt good, but it got me nowhere. After a lot of shaking and complaining, the problem eventually solved itself, but the solution always took longer, and broke a lot more light bulbs, than it needed to. Looking back, my “tradition” was really just the bad habit of injecting energy blindly into a confused situation, hoping for the best. Eventually, when a solution finally presented itself, it was only at random. A paint shaker could have done as well.
That year, a little deliberation made all the difference. Knots, I reasoned, are best untied from the outside, by first finding the parts of each string that aren't in the knot, the ends, the terminal sockets and plugs of each separate strand. One by one, I found and threaded the ends out of the knot. Gradually, the un-knotted ends became longer and longer, as the knot ─ my problem ─ became smaller and smaller, until, eventually, it was gone.
It was tedious and a little boring pulling those ends out of the knot one at a time. Emotionally, this new approach was less satisfying than shaking and tugging at the knot until it finally learned its lesson and fell loose. Still, for achieving predictable results economically, the systematic start-with-the-ends approach beat my traditional flailing-away-at-the knot method hands-down.
Questions to Consider
Things to Do
Once upon a time, hoping that they might learn about colors while haing some fun, the parents of young twins gave each a coloring book, “My Day at the Zoo,” and a big box of crayons. Working separately for many hours, the twins eagerly decorated the many black-outlined animal drawings in their books.
The Operator
At the end of the day, the first twin, beaming with pride, returned her finished book to her parents. She had colored the elephants a precise elephant gray, the horses in various shades of horse-brown, and the birds in many different and very bird-appropriate pastel hues. She had colored every animal picture in her book with obvious care, accurately, smoothly, and consistently, exactly within and never outside of its printed borders.
“What color is this?” the parents asked while pointing to the perfectly colored picture of a canary perched on the branch of a tree. The first twin proudly announced “Yellow!” “And this?” the parents asked, pointing to the tree's branch. “Brown!” she replied. “And this?” they asked of the leaves on the branch. “Green!” said the child with a broad grin.
To her parents' delight, the first twin knew the proper names of every color in the crayon box, too, and even the exotic shades, like periwinkle and cerulean blue. She generalized what she had learned that day as well, correctly identifying the color of the kitchen's new drapes as carnation pink and Dad's necktie as puce. Her parents were very happy. As they had hoped she would, she had learned all about colors.
The Conceptualizer
A while later, the second twin returned with a scribbled-on book full of absurdly colored pictures of bright red lions and deep blue turtles. His baffled parents looked blankly at each other.
“What's this?” asked his parents tentatively, pointing to a purple dog.
“Cool huh?” replied the second twin. “I got that color by mixing the red crayon with the blue one.”
“And this?” asked the parents, pointing to an orange giraffe.
“That's the color you get when you mix the red one and the yellow one,” he replied.
Perplexed, his parents fell silent. Sensing their confusion, the second twin explained, “There are lots of colors in the crayon box, but, here, see?” Using the blue and yellow crayons, he scribbled a few lines across a picture of a cow. “See?” he said again, pointing to the color he had just made. “You can make every different color in the whole box by mixing different amounts of just a few basic colors.” In response to another long, silent stare from his parents, he prompted “See? I made green! Isn't that cool?”
But all his disappointed parents could see was a sloppily colored green cow. “Uh huh… that's… cool...” they muttered through thin smiles, as they silently pondered enrolling him in a Special School.
Encouraging Forests to Hide Among Their Trees
As we travel along our separate paths to professional enlightenment, our journeys' peripheral details tend to distract and even divert us. Not surprising, as, after all, aren't we taught from childhood that great recognition and material reward bloom from the carefully cultivated seeds of knowing the littlest details? A young child, like our first twin, praised by her parents for having just learned and recited the names of the colors of all the crayons in the box, naturally sets about discovering and memorizing the names of all the other colors in her world, too. Eventually, after years of being praised for committing shade after shade to memory, the child, now all grown up, can “ace” a standardized test consisting of multiple-choice name-the-color questions, perhaps to be officially declared a Certified Color Expert (CCE). More recognition, promotion, and material reward ensue, all further proving the value of mastering even the tiniest details.
Yet, aren't the roots of a deep awareness of the human experience of color, which had begun to sprout within the second twin, in the enlightened observation that each can be formed by mixing different amounts of the primary colors of red, green, and blue? Burnt umber's Red/Green/Blue coordinates, for example, are 138, 51, and 36. Likewise, every hue can be expressed as numeric coordinates along these three basic dimensions, and even more profound truths underlie this knowledge, in the physiology of the human eye, and in the physics of light. Perched on the verge of these revelations, with a little encouragement, perhaps the second twin would uncover the few basic laws that govern all these many details? Will his parents find the wisdom to “color” him outside the lines of their own expectations and encourage his quest? Will he brave disappointing his parents and harness the power of his own curiosity to urge himself along in his unorthodox, but more deeply true, pursuit of understanding?
Details, we must master them, but the Truth calls us from beyond them. It waits, masked, behind them. To reveal it, we must risk a deeper way of thinking. And more than merely tolerate it, we must actively encourage such thinking in others.
Society Conditions Us to Be Unethical
Article By: Terry Clancy – www.OnwardEducation.com
Don't be a rat. Don't be a whistleblower. Don't be a tattletale. These are things everyone has heard time and time again while growing up in our society. As children our parents tried to teach us right from wrong. They spent months and years drilling into us how we should act and the consequences if we do the wrong thing. And isn't that how we as parents are teaching our own children?
This can be very confusing for a child. Often times when a child sees another doing something they have been taught is wrong, they will tell a teacher or a parent. The other children then label him/her a tattletale. Peer pressure is often more powerful than the parent's instructions, so what does the child do the next time he/she sees another doing something wrong? They stay silent and look the other way.
This idea is reinforced throughout our lives. Just look at many movies and television shows. It's a very popular scenario; a character on the wrong side of the law is made out to be a hero. There's a code that you do not “rat” anyone out. Now, I'm not suggesting that we stop watching these shows. In fact, I like them as much as the rest of you, but we need to be clear on how to act in actual situations in our own lives.
What did you do the last time you saw a co-worker do something considered by your company to be unethical? Did you confront them or report their behavior? Or, did you look the other way? These are difficult and uncomfortable questions because we've all been in this situation. None one is 100% ethical in every aspect of their lives. We're all human and it's impossible to be perfect. With that said, what we need to strive for is to increase the percentage of times when we are doing the ethical thing. Through continued exposure to ethical discussion and training it will be possible to close the gap between our current percentage and 100%.
It also seems to have become acceptable in our society to engage in unethical behavior if after having been caught you apologize. Now it helps if you seem sincere in your apology, but that's not always necessary. It really says a lot that people are willing to forgive such large transgressions, but where are the consequences for unethical actions? Even as a child you were punished for wrong doing.
Besides societal conditioning, the other major reason why people act unethically is fear. People are afraid of losing their jobs. For instance, perhaps they know of a boss's unethical behavior. Others fear confronting someone engaging in unethical behavior. They would rather stay quiet and in their comfort zone. Some people just don't know the right thing to do, so they look the other way. We need to look beyond the conditioning and fear and look to what is right for your company and your community. Doing the ethical thing is not the equivalent of being a rat, whistleblower, or a tattletale. Doing the ethical thing will pay big dividends in life and at work. In this depressed economy, we need all the tools in our toolbox to stay in business. Ethical behavior by a company will keep customers coming back and draw new customers to you.
For more information on ethics training for your employees please visit; www.OnwardEducation.com.
Permission is given to reproduce this article only in its entirety.
Boring Ethics Training Doesn't Work!
Article by: Terry Clancy
You're ready to go to bed and thoughts of the upcoming day fill your head. Same old, same old you think as you go through your mental checklist. Suddenly, you get that feeling of butterflies in your stomach. You fill with anticipation and joy as you remember that tomorrow is no ordinary day. There is a special meeting for all employees. Yes, it's that time again… mandatory corporate ethics training.
What do you mean, you don't like ethics training? What's the reason for that attitude? Is it because the ethics trainings you've been to are boring and led by someone reading from your corporate Code of Ethics Handbook? The same handbook you were supposed to have read on your own and, in fact, signed a document stating as much?
Unfortunately, all too often ethics training is conducted in this manner. There is such a negative tone to these meetings. You're told what not to do and the consequences for deviating from the Code of Ethics. When organizations are trying to increase ethical behavior, how effective are such trainings?
Most people learn more and remember longer when they are engaged, participate and have fun during the process of learning. Ethics/Compliance training can be fun when real life scenarios are presented to the attendees and together with the trainer they arrive at that answer for what is ethical and unethical. Standing in front of people lecturing to them will not leave a lasting impression, at least not a positive one and they will most certainly not remember much of the material presented.
One question I like to ask the groups I address is “Got Ethics?” Ethics is a word we all use and think we know, but do we all have the same understanding? After speaking with thousands of professionals I found that most people don't really get ethics. They confuse ethics with morality or legality when, in fact, they are three different concepts. From this starting point it then becomes possible to discuss ethical and unethical behavior as a group. We focus on the positive outcomes of ethical behavior, how it can increase your sales or customer service scores, combat negative public perception about your industry, make you a better employee and a better person in your personal life.
Making ethics real to people makes it stick. They no longer see ethics as just a bunch of rules to follow and instead see it as the right thing to do. They understand and internalize that ethical behavior will help everyone involved. Internalization of ethical behavior should be the goal of all ethics trainings.
For more information on ethics training for your employees please contact Terry Clancy at tclancy@onwardeducation.com.
By Suzanne Lucas
March 22nd, 2010 @ 3:16 pm
Dear Evil HR Lady,
I work for a small family business where HR functions are handled by accounting and the department manager. I manage a very small workforce that contributes a great deal to the bottom line. I have recently conducted interviews for a position that is soon to be available. The problem is that the best candidate is a minority, and the owners of the business are racist.
They are not overtly racist, they just put the microscope on every minority I hire, especially minority women. My direct supervisor is not a member of the family, but everyone else above me is. I feel that I would not be helping this candidate to hire her since I can guarantee that I will be asked to terminate her before her probationary period ends for “unsatisfactory performance.”
If I do not hire because my higher ups are racist, then am I guilty of discrimination? I have decided to hire the most qualified person, who is a minority, but I can count the calender days until I am instructed to terminate. What do I do?
Well, this is a sticky situation, isn't it? If the economy were humming along at full speed, I'd tell you to forget about these losers you work for and find a new job. Employers who don't treat their employees fairly soon end up without any good employees, because the good ones leave. That will happen to these people eventually, but in a bad economy, it's easier to keep people who normally wouldn't put up with you. However, I would start looking for a new job anyway because this isn't a place you want to be associated with.
But for the here and now, you need to take control of the situation. Your department contributes to the bottom line. That means other people are dependent upon your work for their paychecks. That gives you some leverage. Let's use it.
First, you need to have clear, objective, quantitative measures for success. This is a critical point. It needs to be established, in writing, what is expected of the new hire. Personally, I'm a fan of SMART objectives. These are objectives that are:
S–Specific M–Measurable A–Achievable R–Relevant T–Time Frame
Once you've written these up, get them approved by your boss and (to be safe) your boss's boss, who is part of the racist family. You need to have their approvals in writing, so that when the time comes you can effectively defend your new hire. Be careful with the SMART objectives: Make sure they're what you want to live and die by, because you'll have to do just that.
With the SMART job objectives in hand, go ahead and make an offer to your best candidate. Go over the details with her and explain that in the past many people have been terminated during the probationary period. Explain that these objectives are new, that they are designed to make sure everyone is on the same page, but again, that other people have been terminated during the probationary period. (And not that you asked, but I really dislike probationary periods. Having a probationary period says, “There will become a time in which you are no longer an at-will employee,” but we'll deal with that some time in the distant future.)
To be fair to the candidate, you need to let her know that there is a possibility she'll be terminated. This is especially important if she's leaving another job. Explain that this is not going to be an easy job and that the family sometimes has a hard time accepting outsiders.
Then bring the candidate on board and work with her to make sure she meets the SMART objectives. If the powers that be want to fire her, you'll have solid evidence in your little hand that she has met all of the objectives. When they say, “But it's the probationary period, we can fire anyone at any time,” you can say, “Yes, that's true, but this function is critical for the bottom line of the company. If I terminate someone who is clearly meeting the objectives we all agreed on, it's going to look like racial or gender discrimination. If she sues, we'll most likely lose, because how would we defend ourselves? Terminating her would be a poor business move, since she is meeting all the objectives.”
Using the “we” form instead of “you” will help soften the blow that you're telling these people they're racist idiots. In fact, they probably won't pick up on it. All you're saying is that it “looks” like discrimination. If they still insist that she be terminated, this is where you need to draw your line in the sand. You need to refuse to terminate the person.
If the family wants to terminate, fine. But, don't you dare be the one who delivers the news. Why? Because often a defense in discrimination lawsuits is that the company can't possibly be racist/sexist/ageist/whateverist because the same person who hired did the firing. The argument is that if there were a problem with illegal discrimination, the person never would have been hired in the first place. Don't give them the opportunity to hide behind you.
I realize that this opens you up for termination. This stinks. But remember, you're a strong contributor to the bottom line. Remind them of that. Stand firm. Don't give in to the temptation to do something wrong to preserve yourself. Sometimes, you've just got to do what's right.
March 19, 2010 by Ken Dooley
Why do customers take their business elsewhere? Sure, sometimes it's about dissatisfaction with the quality or price of the product or service. More often, though, it's about dissatisfaction with people.
Why they leave
The majority of customers take their business elsewhere because salespeople don't listen to what they say or ignore them completely. They also object to salespeople who don't do what they say they will or don't follow up or follow through.
Here are tips that may help your salespeople remember to keep their commitments:
Adapted from Award-Winning Customer Service (AMACOM) by Renee Evenson. Ms. Evenson has worked in customer service management for 30 years and is the author of Customer Service Training 101.
By Margaret Heffernan
March 30th, 2010 @ 8:07 am
When I ran my first business, I was tough. Even my most enthusiastic employees, when giving 360º feedback, said I was tough — but in a good way. I was proud of my reputation. It was a better, I thought, if men didn't think I was a pushover.
One of my jobs was negotiating big contracts with labor unions. Two months into my job, one of these came up for renewal, so the union boss invited me out to lunch, obviously wanting to size me up. We met in a Chinese restaurant; he ordered the food.
As we talked, the most disgusting array of foods began to arrive: ducks' tongues, chicken's feet, gizzards and various body parts. It was clearly a test: was I tough enough to eat it? “If you wanted to intimidate me,” I thought to myself, “Boy, did you pick the wrong girl.” I thought, gratefully, of a stern upbringing in which clearing my plate was mandatory.
I ate every mouthful. I was so tough.
For many years I told that story with relish. Then, when I was running my first software company, we kept running into problems. We never shipped anything on time, the software was too buggy, nobody would give me a straight answer. The only thing we seemed good at developing was rage and frustration.
Driving to pick my daughter up from school one night, I thought again about the Chinese meal and imagined telling it to her. Suddenly, it didn't seem like such a great story. Was that how I wanted her to remember her mother: the toughest woman in town? I realized with a shock how stupid I'd been. Why did I eat all that disgusting food? I should just have signaled to the waiter and ordered something I liked. Instead of playing someone else's game, I should have played my own.
That night I realized why the company wasn't thriving. I was trying to impress everyone — my investors, my customers — with how aggressive I could be. But I wasn't playing my game; I was playing theirs. What we needed wasn't toughness; it was intelligence. What I needed to inspire in other people wasn't fear; it was confidence that I wouldn't commit to impossible targets.
I needed to stop being a manager and start being a leader.
Today I wonder what would have happened if my daughter hadn't provoked that epiphany. Would I ever have figured out how to lead my business? Now I call this the Dinner Time Test. When you're about to do something important at work, picture yourself describing it over a family dinner. Does it make you feel good? Are you sure you're playing your game and not somebody else's? If it's the latter, you may be a manager, but you're not really a leader.
Have you had a similar epiphany or developed your own method of testing important decisions?
By Steve Tobak
March 25th, 2010 @ 6:35 am
If you're not periodically under fire by your management and peers then your career's probably not going anywhere. It's sort of like “no pain no gain.” If you push the envelope and take risks, then you're going to get mercilessly grilled from time to time. That's just the way it works. And if you seriously want to get promoted and make something of yourself, you have to learn to handle it.
No, I'm not talking about growing thick skin and becoming a human punching bag. I'm talking about learning to handle getting fired upon like a true leader. Everyone will walk out of the room thinking you're the next Lou Gerstner or Jack Welch. Okay, maybe not, but they'll definitely think more of you and will more readily accept your ideas, proposals, and most importantly, promotions.
How'd I learn this stuff? By spending much of my career selling innovative strategies to risk averse CEOs, CFOs, and management teams. Sure, I probably came across as whiny and defensive in the early days, but in time I learned the ropes. Here they are:
How to Lead Under Fire
By Penelope Trunk
March 18th, 2010 @ 10:42 am
You will never create a solid career for yourself by worrying about who is stealing your ideas. People hate whiners, they hate bickering, and, most importantly, people who are confident that they have tons of ideas don't keep track of each one. And, to be honest, people do not get far by just having ideas. You need to have ideas and be likable. That's almost impossible to do if you worry about whose ideas were whose.
So cut it out. Worrying about who gets credit for which ideas will prevent you from having a fulfilling work life. Here are five reasons why:
1) You do not have a finite number of good ideas
The best idea people - the ones who have tons of good ideas - share them. If you're an entrepreneur, for instance, you have an idea and call six friends to share it. They each tell you why your idea won't work, and you do the same thing the next week, until you land on an idea that does work. The mix of friends might ebb and flow, but for an entrepreneur, the ideas never stop coming and you never stop sharing them.
Or take the person at an ad agency who is great with coming up with ideas. Sure, it's that person's job to sit in a room with clients and brainstorm, tossing out idea after idea for hours at a time. But you want to follow that model. Because really it's everyone's job at every company to come up with ideas. What are you doing in life if you are not being creative? Every job is creative. Every person is creative - you just need to unleash that part of yourself.
The people who have lots of ideas don't treat their ides as if they are precious. If your ideas are so valuable that they need protecting - or you think they do - you'll come across as someone who is anything but creative. Then no one will hire you for your ideas. So if you want to be known for your ideas, act like someone who has a lot of them. Keep them coming and give them away all the time. In the end, it will benefit you. If people steal them, take it as a compliment. The people with the fewest ideas are the ones who hoard them.
2) There are no unique ideas.
Get over yourself. I know you're brilliant, but trust me when I tell you that someone has had the same idea - whatever it is. Do yourself a favor and instead of worrying about being the idea person, become the person that can make the idea reality. Everyone has ideas. Few people can execute. Deliver the ideas, and do it in a fun way. That will bring meaning to your work life.
3) People like nice people, not smart people
My favorite workplace research shows that people would rather work with people who are likeable than people who are competent. The research is from Tiziana Casciaro, and was published in the Harvard Business Review twice - maybe like a nuclear bomb, because people didn't believe it the first time.
In fact, people view the nice people as more competent, even if they are not. And the skilled people who are jerks start appearing incompetent to their co-workers. That's how powerful being nice at the office is. In other words, others will view you as you better at your job if you stop bitching about who gets credit for ideas.
In my experience, the person everyone likes is the person who helps others get their job done. That person genuinely cares if you are happy doing your work; she genuinely cares if you feel connected and engaged. One way to become that well-liked person - share your ideas.
4) Your job is to make your boss happy
Complaining doesn't make your boss's life easier. And demanding that your boss give you all the credit does not help, either. If you make your boss's life a dream, your boss will help you. She will mentor you, train you, guide you through the organization and pay you well. If she does that, so what if she takes your ideas? And if she doesn't do that, then leave.
Bosses do not complain that they don't have enough idea people working for them. Bosses complain that there is too much work to do. This is because bosses always think they are the idea people, whether or not they are. So if your boss thinks your co-worker has all the ideas, it doesn't matter. Your boss will promote the person who gets things done. In fact, maybe this means you should give your co-worker all your ideas and frame yourself as the one who is actually helping your boss day to day.
5) If you want to get credit for your ideas, get a blog
Resumes don't showcase ideas. Resumes are a history of what others have allowed you to do in their organization. If you want to be known for the ideas you are coming up with right now, then write a blog. It's incredibly easy to write a blog if you have a lot of ideas. The ideas don't have to reveal company secrets; they just need to reveal how you think - about a wide range of things in your field.
My company, Brazen Careerist, is a good starting point for creating an idea-based resume. And once you get started, you will see yourself differently; you'll feel more valuable.
So start putting your ideas out for public consumption. That's how you really get credit for good ideas. By saying them often and in front of lots of people. Think about that: It's hard to steal someone's ideas when those ideas are out in public. A warning, though: Don't write about people stealing your ideas - that's a bore. Just write the ideas. Talk about ideas on your blog, and others will associate those ideas with you.
Not all your ideas will be good, or on target. But it's more important simply to spout ideas regularly. So-called experts are not right more than the rest of us with opinions we don't share; they are just willing to put their ideas out there. Experts are people who start interesting conversations.
Where will all this get you? Someone will want to hire you or work with you not because of the list of tasks on your resume, but because you are that person with all those ideas. And once you're hired as the idea person, it doesn't matter if someone steals your ideas. Spreading ideas will be your job - and your work life will be richer for it.
March 16th, 2010 @ 6:05 am
If you run a company full of smart people, they will find faults and mistakes everywhere, and they'll complain. That's fine. It can become destructive, though, if it evolves into a culture of complaint.
I learned this lesson when I had my first experience working as a consultant, for a Massachusetts software start-up called Vertigo Technology. As you can tell from the name, the founders had high expectations of their own success — expectations which were unrealized when the company closed down in the late 1990s. It had been packed with many brilliant people, many of whom went on to achieve big successes elsewhere.
But this company was destroyed by its own internal demons. Everyone found fault with corporate strategy, tactics, products, sales, marketing, right down to the Standard Operating Procedure guidelines for taking a shower on company premises. (No, I'm not joking.)
At first, I found the company's openness exhilarating. How democratic that everyone could speak their mind! But after a year or so, I came to see that everyone spent more time arguing abstractions than producing profits. The company became what venture capitalists call “the living dead” — bringing in enough revenue to cover costs but never building a company anyone would want to buy.
Later, I realized our fatal flaw lay in chronic complaining: We didn't distinguish between the faults that have to be fixed and the faults you can't afford the time to fix. The memory haunted me when I started my first technology company. Determined to curtail the whining, I introduced a rule: all complaints to me had to be accompanied by at least one proposed solution.
The rule was a big success. Here's why:
So many companies become the walking dead when they focus on complaints rather than solutions. Does your company have a culture of complaint? If it does, what are you doing about it?
By Geoffrey James
March 10th, 2010 @ 11:30 am
The best thing about writing Sales Machine is you readers are a lot smarter than I am. As a result, this blog often gets comments that are full of practical wisdom. My recent post “How to Get Prospects in the Pipeline” elicited a brilliant response from “ndlicht1″ (in real life sales guru Neil Licht.) Here's his comment, slightly edited:
Your challenge is not just getting prospects into the pipeline, but getting the right prospect… right at the point when he or she is ready to buy. Here's a seven-step program for accomplishing this: Step #1. Target. Clearly define and list the target market(s) for your offerings. Step #2. Adapt. Learn the language and lingo of your target market(s). Once you understand it and can speak it, you'll not just be able to communicate with them, but you'll be better able to relate to their challenges. Step #3. Plug Yourself In. Locate and subscribe to wire services and news services that serve each market or sub-market that you listed. Step #4. Research. Immerse yourself in insider news. Look for names about events that are actually buying signals and need signals. Step #5: Organize. Using the results of your research, create a list of decision-makers and key influencers. Be sure your list includes information about the article that seemed to signal a possible need for your offering. Step #6: Craft. Create a “30 second commercial” for each specific title on your call list. This “commercial” should mention the article that engendered the call and explain how you helped somebody similar to the prospect with a similar challenge. Step #7: Call. Contact the executives on your list and ask for some time to “visit and discuss” this. Quallify it as an issue and bring up other issues that you know probably need handling, based on the information in the article.
Your challenge is not just getting prospects into the pipeline, but getting the right prospect… right at the point when he or she is ready to buy. Here's a seven-step program for accomplishing this:
This targeted method works well because the “event” that triggers the call suggests a need for your offering, making more likely that decision maker or key influencer will become the entry point for a qualified opportunity.
IMHO, Neil's process is money in your pocket when it comes to loading up your pipeline with qualified leads. And I like the way that Neil has structured it so that ANYBODY can do, with nothing more than a web browser and (maybe) a credit card. Bravo!
by Elaine Pofeldt and Adriana Gardella
If there's one big workplace lie that any new manager should wise up to fast, it's “There are no office politics here.” Higher-ups may do their best to discourage gossip and to foster a schmooze-free meritocracy, but let's be honest: There's no workplace on the planet where fostering good relationships isn't key to getting things done.
And now that you've become a boss, it's even more important that you “get” the political environment of your office and learn how to work effectively with higher-ups, peers, and direct reports. Here are five lessons to master in your first 90 days.
No matter how close your friendships with your officemates have been, it's time to put up some walls. “If I were managing a colleague I once hung out with, I'd stop doing it,” says Caroline Ceniza-Levine, co-founder of Six Figure Start, a career coaching and consulting firm in New York City. Harsh as this may seem, if you don't establish professional boundaries, you won't have the objectivity to supervise effectively.
Patrice Williams, 39, a management consultant from Vallejo, Calif. learned this the hard way. In her twenties, she moved up to team supervisor at IBM, where she found herself managing a salesperson with whom she socialized on weekends. Soon after, her pal began coming to work late, skipping meetings, and neglecting clients, dragging down her sales in the process. Williams soon realized she needed to fire her friend, but she just couldn't. Ultimately, her boss had to step in. “I lost points,” explains Williams, who says it was hard for her to recover professionally. From that point on, she changed her relationship with direct reports — “I'm personable, but not personal” — and learned to talk to them immediately about performance problems.
A few tips on how to head off awkwardness with former peers:
“All I ever wanted to be was a staff nurse,” says Mary Parker, now a nurse manager. Her early days in management were rocky. Because she values independence and self-direction, she figured her direct reports (nurses and nurse assistants) felt the same way. Parker assumed they would understand their responsibilities, work cooperatively, and mentor each other. But that's not what happened. “Instead, staff members complained to me about the quality of their co-workers' documentation and care,” Parker says. “Policies weren't being followed and we had close calls with medication errors.”
Many companies fall short when it comes to training new managers, says Shultz. Your bosses won't expect you to know how to tackle every aspect of your new job from the outset, but they will assume that you will ask for the help you need. So, if your company wants you to take on a legally sensitive task such as giving performance reviews, and you've never done it before, don't try to wing it. Ask for coaching from HR or higher-ups. “Without training, it's easy for a new manager to overlook the implications of what one wrong thing said can do,” says Shultz. If you can't get the level of help you need internally, sign up for one of the educational programs at the Society for Human Resource Management, which runs educational programs in many cities, he advises.
Engineer Charlene Burke was a star in the field. “I was exceptionally good at short-term relationships — my customers loved me.” But soon after receiving a promotion to a customer service call center manager, Burke no longer felt the love. She barely knew her staff when she implemented a thank-you program that rewarded top-performing employees with a small gift card. Burke presented the first gift card to a woman who had been with the company for 19 years. The effort backfired. The woman was embarrassed to be singled out and praised for merely doing her job. The staff was tight, almost like family, which Burke hadn't taken the time to understand.
If you're new to a company, understand that no matter how similar the culture seems to others you've experienced, it is going to have its own unique and sometimes bizarre quirks. “Learn how things get done — both the rational and irrational aspects of it,” advises Nat Stoddard, chairman of Crenshaw Associates, an executive coaching firm in New York City, and author of “The Right Leader: Selecting Executives Who Fit.” Listen carefully when colleagues volunteer tips on, say, the best time of day to approach a senior manager, and pay attention when they tell stories about the office. At the same time, says Stoddard, don't get too inquisitive. “If you are overly interested in learning something, they will wonder, ‘Why? What's your motive?'” As you build your new colleagues' trust, they'll volunteer more details.
It's easy to cut yourself off from a vital pipeline if you always eat lunch alone, a common rookie mistake. Curt Braverman, a veteran manager who worked for 25 years at Pitney Bowes, realized this early in his career, when a colleague finally pushed him to grab a bite and proved to be a font of useful information. “If they've been around a while, they'll give you a hint of what's coming up and can give you some tips that will make your job easier,” says Braverman.
As the new director of operations at a now-defunct software development company, Stephen Balzac was tasked with managing engineers. He noticed right away that each week the team wasted a full day in a marathon meeting where they tracked software bugs using a primitive system. Everyone hated the meetings. So Balzac did some research and bought a proper bug-tracking system. He thought everyone would be thrilled. No more meetings! Instead, he met with passive resistance. Balzac was baffled until he realized that his unilateral decision had offended the engineers. They wanted to be consulted and made a part of the problem-solving process.
Be careful about seeming too closely aligned with any one person — even your direct boss, says Stephen Viscusi, CEO of the New York-based executive search firm Viscusi Group and author of “Bulletproof Your Job.” The best job-protection insurance, especially as a newbie, is to remain as neutral as possible on controversial issues, he says. If your boss asks for a point of view, run through the pros and cons of a decision rather than answer directly.
Should your manager ask for your support at a meeting, offer it, but remain as neutral as possible when you're at the conference room table. If the boss buttonholes you later to ask why you didn't speak up more, you can say something diplomatic, like “Maybe I wasn't emphatic enough,” Viscusi suggests. Remember that your boss could be gone tomorrow — and you could be working for the person whose point of view he opposed. “You have to be a little Machiavellian,” he says.
Showing your bosses that you're ready to take on new projects isn't just a matter of stellar performance or demonstrating initiative — though these things certainly help. You also need to prove to the top brass that they can trust you in subtler ways. Many new managers over-explain to direct reports why they must take on a particular task and in doing so, pass along information from their bosses that was better kept confidential. To establish trust with your supervisor, err on the side of keeping your conversations quiet and, when in doubt, ask if the content is for general consumption. “You'll be on the hook for sharing that information,” says Ceniza-Levine.
You'll also gain points by acknowledging that your bosses are privy to certain information that you don't have. Say, for instance, that you ask your boss if you can hire two more people but she says “no.” Rather than step up your lobbying, ask if there is a reason for her opposition that she can share, or, perhaps, one that she can't disclose to you right now, suggests Stefanie Smith, principal of Stratex Consulting, an executive coaching firm in New York City. You never know — the company could be considering an acquisition that will fulfill that requirement, says Smith.
Even with solid backing from the top, you won't be able to get anything done if your team isn't behind you. This often means building support among longtime or more senior workers — including some who wanted your job and didn't get it. You won't win any allegiance by reminding them that you have an MBA or that your last gig was at an even bigger company. Meet with each member of your team individually to learn about his background and ask for advice on upcoming projects. “Let them know you'll be relying on their expertise,” says Andrea Nierenberg, principal of The Nierenberg Group, an executive training and consulting firm in New York City. You don't have to act on the advice they give you, but listening carefully will go a long way toward building the good relationships you will need to succeed.
Looking back on his days as a rookie manager for a contract staffing firm, Ken Wisnefski recalls spending most of his time in his office with the door closed. “I only came out to criticize or discipline the staff,” he says. “I wanted to avoid getting caught up in issues that were really my job to correct and prevent,” he explains. Not surprisingly, his staff soon resented him, whispering that he probably wasn't even working while holed up. Now a business owner, Wisnefski says he goes out of his way to lead by example. “While I want them to respect me, I also want them to view me as a co-worker.”
By Sean Silverthorne
March 8th, 2010 @ 9:01 am
In a recent portrait of Avatar director James Cameron, Rebecca Keegan outlines five leadership rules the director brings to each movie set. Reading it I was struck by how Cameron's style matches what we've learned about Apple CEO Steve Jobs.
But don't go teaching these traits, which admittedly produce incredible innovation, to MBA students. In fact, following any of these styles will get you fired — unless you have the inspiration genius that can deliver results like Cameron and Jobs.
Here are three areas where the computer and cinema wunderkinds overlap.
Bonding Through Innovation
Cameron. “Breaking new ground is Cameron's raison d'être — nothing interests this man unless it's hard to do,” Keegan writes. “But innovation has also become a way of bonding his teams… For Cameron, a sense of exploration isn't just personally enriching, it's a crucial tool for motivating and uniting his teams.”
Jobs. When Jobs created the original Macintosh team in the early 1980s, he moved the group to a remote building on the Apple campus, raised a pirate flag above the roof, and moved in a popcorn machine to give his people a sense of esprit de corps. Today, management experts prefer you unite your groups rather than pitting them against each other, but they also love the idea of inspiring your team with sense of purpose they can rally around.
More Perfection, Please
Cameron. On Avatar, Keegan reports, “Hours were spent on the smallest details, like getting alien sap to drip precisely right…. It's hard to argue with Cameron's nitpicky style, however, when audiences thrill to immerse themselves in the richly detailed worlds he creates.”
Jobs: Just weeks before launch of the original iPhone, Apple decided to replace the plastic touch screen with optical-quality glass. The change not only delayed the introduction, but caused its screen vendor, Balda, to reconfigure parts of its assembly line “causing a material impact on financials,” according to AppleInsider. For Jobs, however, the aesthetic of the product would have been ruined by an inferior screen.
Inspiration Through Fear
Again, not a great trait you'd teach to MBAs, but both Cameron and Jobs are stern taskmasters who demand the most of their employees, and occasionally cross the line to get it.
Cameron. “Many Cameron alumni will share a story from their first film with him, a day they were sure they were going to be fired, almost hoped for it. But Cameron rarely fires people. ‘Firing is too merciful,' he says. Instead he tests their endurance for long hours, hard tasks, and harsh criticism. Survivors tend to surprise themselves by turning in the best work of their careers, and signing on for Cameron's next project.”
Jobs. “”It was probably the best work I ever did,” former Apple designer Corsdell Ratzlaff told Inside Steve's Brain author Leander Kahaney. “It was exhilratating. It was exciting. Sometimes it was difficult, but he had the ability to pull the best out of people.”
If these men, both brilliant in their own fields, managed by the book, I doubt they would be nearly as successful. What they share is passion for the work, and their management styles both demand and instill passion in the people that work around them.
Have you worked for someone with the passion exhibited by Cameron and Jobs? What was the experience like, and what did you take away from the experience?
Yesterday, Alison Davis discussed rant sites—the dark side of social media. Today, she shares proactive practices for controlling social media use. Plus, we'll take a look at a unique one-stop source for solving HR problems.
The best approach to keeping former employees quiet, Davis says, is to tie agreements about future behavior, non-disclosure, and so on, to a severance agreement. Keep the payoff for a date in the future, and make it clear, "If you violate this agreement, we won't pay you your money."
Davis is CEO of Davis & Company (davisandco.com). She made her comments at a recent webinar.
"If you don't offer severance, you don't have as many rights for controlling ex-employees. You can try to sue for slander or libel," Davis says, "but that's a difficult case to make because you have to prove damages to the company."
If an ex-employee who has no severance were to blog "I was fired, and here are the facts," you've got no basis for legal action, Davis says. If the person blogs, "I hated my boss," you've got no basis for action. If the person discloses "Here are my company's confidential plans and financial data," now that could be the basis for legal action, Davis says.
How should you go about setting boundaries and guidelines for your employees and ex-employees? Start with your current employees, says Davis.
"There is no right or wrong answer about how to approach it; you have to decide as a company where you fall," Davis says. She thinks of it as color-coded:
Green—You encourage employees to contribute to social media sites. In other words, you decide that use of social media has equal or more benefit than risk.
Yellow—You acknowledge that employees participate and outline expectations—you may do this but not that, what you do at home is your own business except for this and that. In other words, you don't intend to prohibit use, but there are rules.
Red—No, you're not letting anyone engage in this activity. In other words, you are going to restrict employees to using company electronic resources only for business-related matters. This approach is necessary for certain industries, for example for defense contractors, Davis notes.
For many employers, the first level of interest is to ensure that the personal use of social networking websites or systems does not interfere with working time. In any event, when employees are involved with these sites, it must be clear that they are not acting as a spokesperson for the company, Davis says.
Finally, Davis says, "don't forget logos. That's a big one for many companies. You really don't want people splashing your logo all over their Web pages."
Social media. Just one of dozens of challenges on the HR desk—COBRA changes, FMLA intermittent leave, ADA accommodation, off-the-clock workers, just to name a few.
Social media is clearly the coming thing for hip companies, but there is a dark side, says Alison Davis, a communications consultant. She recommends that employers take a proactive approach.
Davis shared a story of Gannett, owner of USA Today. Gannet planned major layoffs nationwide, but intended to announce them only at the local level, so that no one would know the total number of employees affected.
Soon a disgruntled ex-employee began a blog to track Gannett's layoffs. He began to post the information on his blog. "We're going to add it all up for you," he said. He created a map that showed all the layoffs nationwide.
Unfortunately for Gannett, Davis says, when you lay off journalists, you lay off a group who are pretty savvy about how to find information, and how to present it.
The main lesson is that the blogger was able to aggregate information that Gannett expected to keep private, and there wasn't much Gannett could do about it.
"Rant sites are a level worse," Davis notes. She calls them “moaning and complaining" sites. They encourage what she calls "management stinks" blogs.
Take, for example, JobSchmob.com, she says. Here's a taste:
"I worked for about eight months in advertising sales for Screenvision, selling onscreen theatre advertising. Warning: Onscreen advertising is one step above being a total scam and a completely ineffective means of spending your advertising dollars. The commercial spots are an insignificant 10 seconds, and are shown mostly in half-empty theatres, to kids with no buying power or people who regard onscreen ads as little more than an annoyance. They are totally ineffective. The company has something like an 8% renewal rate! That's abysmal.
"… The company management is made up of idiots who are out of step and totally clueless as to the realities of the world we live in. The regional VP was located in our office. I have known doorknobs with more brains than this idiot.
"DO NOT ever do business with Screenvision, and don't ever consider going to work for them! They're the Anti-Christ of the advertising world."
"Not what you'd want a prospective employee or customer to be reading," notes Davis. But as long as the blogger is reciting his or her experience, there's not much you can do about it, she says.
For another example of another kind of social media site, check out Cafepharma.com, says Davis. Cafe has a message group for every significant pharmaceutical company and for geographic regions and tech specialties like IT.
"Depending on industry, geography, and how strong a presence you are in your industry, these groups will spring up as places where people congregate and talk about your company," Davis warns.
By Geoffrey James February 24th, 2010 @ 8:00 am
Last week's huge post “Is a Sales Career Right for You?” went through the characteristics that top sales professionals share. However, the lack of those characteristics aren't the only reason that sales pros fail. Here are the top ten reasons that people (mostly new-hires) fail to build a successful career in Sales. Some of them are similar to the ones described in the original post, but some are new:
In a previous post, we talked about the three different job descriptions most jobs have. Today, we'll look at 10 specific factors you can evaluate as you work to unite those three job descriptions into one.
These 10 elements describe the specific job requirements in terms of "compensable factors." You can use these factors to gauge whether the job description properly captures the job, and you can use these factors to help gauge the level of compensation that is appropriate, as well as the exempt/nonexempt status of the position.
Hereare the primary compensable factors:
1. Experience. How long should the incumbent have worked in this job or in closely related jobs to be fully qualified? Is it important that the experience be within or outside the organization?
2. Education. What does the job require in terms of formal schooling, training, certification, or knowledge of a specialized field?
3. Responsibility. Is the employee responsible for the safety of other employees or for the loss or damage to tools, materials, or equipment? How significant to the employer is the work the position is responsible for? How big is the budget the incumbent manages?
4. Complexity of duties. Does the job require the incumbent to show judgment and initiative or to make independent decisions?
5. Supervision received. How closely does the incumbent's immediate supervisor or manager check his or her work? Does the supervisor or manager outline specific methods or work procedures?
6. Supervision exercised. How many people does the incumbent supervise, directly and indirectly? What responsibility does he or she have for controlling policy decisions, costs, or work methods?
7. Consequences of error. If the incumbent made an error, what dollar loss would be likely to result? How often does the possibility of loss or error occur?
8. Working conditions. Is there anything in the work environment that is unusually hazardous or uncomfortable? For what percentage of the time is the incumbent exposed to such conditions?
9. Mental, physical, and visual demands. What degree of concentration is required? Are there special physical demands? Is eyestrain likely?
10. Confidential data. To what extent is the incumbent responsible for confidential information? What would be the consequences of unwarranted disclosure? To what extent are integrity and discretion important?
Links